I recently threatened to rejoin Weight Watchers again, but this time on my own terms. I would follow Paleo principles as closely as possible and take advantage of the weekly weigh in for accountability, as well as the psychological training you get at the group meetings. I would use the PointsPlus as a surrogate for calorie counting, as that is clearly important for losing weight.
So I actually did it. I rejoined. Then I quit a couple of days later. Why? My new dietary philosophy is, simply, incommensurable with Weight Watchers. The new PointsPlus system penalizes foods that are high in carbs and fat and rewards you for eating foods high in protein and high in fiber. Which means Weight Wathcers would penalize most of the foods I would eat, as they tend to be high fat and low fiber.* See Weight Watchers' CEO David Kirchoff's explanation for the new points system.
So they are still fat phobic and have deep faith in the health benefits of fiber, which is disappointing. They recognize that refined carbs are perhaps not so healthy and that is a good thing. But then they offer tools like a bar code scanner for your smart phone that will tell you how many points there are per serving in packaged foods. Real food does not usually come with a bar code. And the thought of eating skinless chicken breasts and canned tuna fish (high protein and low fat) in order to get the most out of my points was not appealing. They still list canola and other seed oils as "healthy" and promote non-fat products such as fat-free yogurt.
But what really sealed the decision to quit was that the first item I looked up in their data base, coconut oil, was not even listed. That's when I remembered the word "incommensurable" from my philosophy of science studies. We are talking about competing world views and it just isn't possible to mesh them together. It's a bit like trying to get an evangelical Christian to mesh her/his beliefs with Mormonism. It just ain't gonna happen.
*I have nothing against fiber, but believe it should come from whole fruits and vegetables, not ground psyllium husks added to packaged foods. I also do not think it prevents heart disease and cancer.
Sunday, April 8, 2012
It is possible to construct a great tasting, low carb hot fudge sundae using the following recipe. I cobbled together the recipe below using my experience eating in France as a guide.
2 cups heavy whipping cream
3 egg yolks
1 tablespoon pure vanilla extract
Artificial sweetener to equal 1/2 cup of sugar
Mix all ingredients together and pour into an ice cream maker (such as this Cuisinart). In 25 minutes, you have vanilla ice cream.
Total grams of carbs in the entire batch: 2 (in the egg yolks and vanilla extract). Assuming you get eight small servings of ice cream, that is about 1/4 of a carb per serving.
Hot Fudge Topping
100 grams 70% dark chocolate (e.g., Lindt 70% dark chocolate, available at Wal-Mart)
1/4 cup heavy whipping cream
3 tablespoons of butter
Break chocolate bar into pieces over a double boiler, and add the butter. When the butter and chocolate are melted, add in the heavy whipping cream. Remove double boiler from heat source, but leave over the boiler until ready to serve. It will be hot going on to the ice cream but will harden to a shell if left on the ice cream for too long.
Makes three servings. Total carbs in the batch: 33, or 11 per serving.
Whip up a quarter cup of heavy whipping cream and sweeten with your favorite artificial sweetener.
Servings: 2. Total carbs: 0.
Making the Hot Fudge Sundae
Make the hot fudge sundae by scooping out 1/2 cup of ice cream, 1/3 of the hot fudge topping, and half of the whipping cream.
Total carbs per decadent serving: about 12.
This is an example of a high fat, low carb (and low protein) dessert. According the the received wisdom, that carbs alone are fattening, that eating fat helps us lose weight, and that calories don't count, this should be an ideal food for weight loss.
But look at the calorie count in the dessert listed above: 250 calories per half cup serving of the ice cream, 325 calories for the hot fudge topping, and 100 calories for the whipping cream. A total of 675 calories for a relatively small dessert. Assuming that you only eat the portions described above.
But hey, even if you ate the entire batch, it would only have 35 total grams of carbs, so it shouldn't be fattening, should it? I could eat the whole batch and still stay in ketosis. Just ignore the 3,017 total calories. Move along, nothing to see. Prominent low carbers are actually promoting dessert recipes laden with fat similar to my hot fudge sundae recipe above, so this is not an extreme example. (The "prominent low carber" recipe linked to above contains a whopping 4,400 calories and fits into a 9x13 pan, so I am assuming there are 12 bars per recipe, or 365 calories per square. Sincere question: how many people would eat just one square?).
And I won't even begin to discuss all of the food reward issues in the hot fudge sundae recipe.
Which is why I am no longer following a low carb diet. I eat a sane diet (the Perfect Health Diet) comprised of real, nourishing foods. It's calories that matter for weight loss, in combination with real, whole foods and exercise.
Posted by Wright Mind at 1:05 PM